Vulnerability Management

12,000 findings in the queue.
77 actually exploitable.

Scanner accuracy runs 30 to 50 percent on a good day. Xora hands you the short list an attacker would actually use — each finding exploited in staging, with the evidence and the vulnerable code attached.

Why change?

A backlog full of findings nobody can act on

SCA reports run 90 percent false positives, and SAST isn't better — teams call the tools 30 percent accurate, maybe 50 if you're lucky. So every finding gets triaged by security before engineering ever sees it, onboarding a new scanner puts you a thousand findings behind SLA on day one, and the only question that matters — is this exploitable? — never gets answered.

How it works

Proof Replaces Prioritization

Exploited, Not Scored

“Exploitable” means Xora exploited it, in your staging environment. It's a confirmed state, not a probability — so the filter actually means something.

Evidence Engineers Act On

Each exploit ships with the request, the response, and full reproduction steps — evidence your engineers can replay, not a severity score to debate.

The Fix, Then the Proof It Held

Source access pinpoints the vulnerable code. Ship the fix and Xora re-runs the exploit to verify it no longer works.

I want to see a list of what we really need to work on — not tens of thousands of alerts.
A security leader, on scanner noise
Differentiation

Close the Found-to-Fixed Gap

Vulnerability management tools rank what scanners found. Xora changes what “found” means: every finding arrives already exploited, already reproduced, and already tied to the source that caused it. Prioritization stops being a meeting and becomes a filter — and when a ticket does reach an engineer, they can trust it enough to drop what they're doing.

Engineers get a working reproduction instead of a ticket queue, so fixes land in hours, not sprints.
Straight answers

The Questions You’re Already Asking

“Will it flood us with everything ugly in our code?”

No. If Xora can't exploit it, it doesn't page you. The queue is the short list, not the landfill.

“I want to decide what matters before it runs.”

You do: scope, targets, and your threat model are set before the first run, so severity reflects your priorities from the first scan.

“Who says it's really a critical?”

The exploit does. Severity comes from what the exploit actually reached, and every finding carries its reproduction — so there's no inflated critical to argue down.

See what a queue with zero noise looks like

We ran Xora against OWASP Juice Shop, a deliberately vulnerable practice app. The report is an exploitable-only findings list: nothing theoretical, every finding with its evidence and reproduction steps — the queue this page promises, in the shape your team would actually work it.

Enter your email and we'll send you the PDF. No sales call required to see it.

Stop triaging maybes. Start fixing exploits.

Get a Demo